Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

»ó¾Ç ±¸Ä¡ºÎ¿¡ ½Ä¸³µÈ »õ·Î¿î Å×ÀÌÆÛ µðÀÚÀÎ ÀÓÇÁ¶õÆ®ÀÇ ÈÄÇâÀû ÀÓ»ó ¿¬±¸

Retrospective clinical study of new tapered design implants in maxillary posterior areas

±¸°­»ý¹°Çבּ¸ 2013³â 37±Ç 2È£ p.105 ~ 111
Àå¹®Á¤, À±ÇÊ¿µ, ±è¿µ±Õ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Àå¹®Á¤ ( Jang Moon-Jung ) - ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
À±ÇÊ¿µ ( Yun Pil-Young ) - ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
±è¿µ±Õ ( Kim Young-Kyun ) - ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°­¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú

Abstract


Purpose: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of new tapered design implants installed in maxillary posterior areas.

Materials and Methods: From Jun 2011 through October 2012, 17 patients (14 men, 3 women) treated with tapered implants (Osstem TS IV) were considered. Thirty-eight implants (6 premolar and 32 molar) were placed in maxillary posterior areas. Implant stability and crestal bone loss were measured.

Results: The implant stability quotient value was 59.9 at implant placement and 70.5 at the second surgery, indicating a significant difference. Mean crestal bone loss was 0.15¡¾0.15 mm (no sinus elevation group: 0.10¡¾0.13 mm; sinus elevation and simultaneous group: 0.16¡¾0.15 mm; sinus elevation and delayed group: 0.20¡¾0.19 mm). There was no significant difference according to sinus elevation or between the simultaneous group and delayed group. The success rate was 97.4%, and the survival rate was 97.4%.

Conclusion: New tapered design implants should be applied to maxillary posterior areas.

Å°¿öµå

Bone loss; Implant; Tapered; Survival rate

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI